Oh, sweet merciful fire, two notes:
(1) Even Latham & Watkins, ya'll.
(2) The lawyer defending an AI company for using stolen IP to train their AI/LLM used the company's AI/LLM to cite check her brief, which hallucinated results.
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lbvgwxkmovq/ANTHROPIC%20COPYRIGHT%20LAWSUIT%20dukanovic.pdf
(1) Even Latham & Watkins, ya'll.
(2) The lawyer defending an AI company for using stolen IP to train their AI/LLM used the company's AI/LLM to cite check her brief, which hallucinated results.
https://fingfx.thomsonreuters.com/gfx/legaldocs/lbvgwxkmovq/ANTHROPIC%20COPYRIGHT%20LAWSUIT%20dukanovic.pdf
Comments
It's like if you asked me for advice on fishing. I vaguely know there might be choices and if you do it wrong you can put out an eye. Looks cool tho
1) the AI
2) attorney time to use the AI
3) paralegal time to check the cites
4) attorney time to file the apology motion
5) other things that I’m surely missing.
Win. Win. Win. Win. Win.