ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
jfruh.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
do you thinks it was david brooks or his editor who decided to use this euphemism instead of "blood and soil"
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
ingforart.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
Classic Brooks!
0
reply
[–]
unclekitsune.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
Editor probably told him to "Use more precise words, that's too emotionally charged." Would bet almost verbatim.
2
reply
[–]
fattig.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
Lymph and loam is shorter AND alliterative. I should be the editor.
1
reply
[–]
jfruh.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
honestly very funny that he describes something as being the "dictionary definition" of a phrase that as of right now has exactly 6 google hits, all of which are either this column or references to it
20
1
reply
[–]
ingforart.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
Even odds he had chat gtp try to disguise his dripping racism
2
1
reply
[–]
jfruh.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
i mean he's pretty firmly against blood and soil/"ancestry and homeland" nationalism in this column, so he's being non-racist for once
2
1
reply
[–]
ingforart.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
Not enough
0
1
reply
[–]
ingforart.bsky.social
•
5 days ago
But ai... clearly got false positives
1
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments