Right now, DOGE is saying that any new hires have to be approved by their office.
In 1980, when IL Governor Thompson said any new hires had to be approved by his office, the Supreme Court said it was unconstitutional politicization of hiring.
What about now?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/02/employee-firing-first-amendment/681702/?gift=4YXRwVM-J6aWKQGOgeUNfGiMXc3HiKuuQRyYopjoW4U&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
In 1980, when IL Governor Thompson said any new hires had to be approved by his office, the Supreme Court said it was unconstitutional politicization of hiring.
What about now?
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2025/02/employee-firing-first-amendment/681702/?gift=4YXRwVM-J6aWKQGOgeUNfGiMXc3HiKuuQRyYopjoW4U&utm_source=copy-link&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=share
Comments
Either way enough of them being sent in would bog down either human or programs
That stuff was the whole point of the FDRLST growing injustices in the lab for the last 50 years
Those pesky precedents haven't gotten in their way recently when there was a political point to be made.
Not sure they are going to feel the vibe you're sending.
You fix it.
Other than those looking to cash 8n on their Nazi credentials I doubt anyone else would even consider it.
1980 specifically was the beginning of the end with the rise of Newt Gingrich & the Moral Majority.
Or do they avoid those kind cases altogether?
That’s how I know it’s crap.