A huge portion of this, from on the ground reports, is judges “pretermitting” asylum applications — denying them without allowing them the hearing they are entitled by law.
The Trump admin told judges they could do this and they’re off to the races. I’ve heard *infuriating* stories of it so far.
The Trump admin told judges they could do this and they’re off to the races. I’ve heard *infuriating* stories of it so far.
Reposted from
Austin Kocher, PhD
Immigration Judges Closed and Denied More Asylum Cases in March Than Any Month on Record
In a record-breaking month, immigration judges fast-tracked asylum denials at a record pace, raising questions about the future of the asylum system.
austinkocher.substack.com/p/immigratio...
In a record-breaking month, immigration judges fast-tracked asylum denials at a record pace, raising questions about the future of the asylum system.
austinkocher.substack.com/p/immigratio...
Comments
Seems to me like there’s more danger of such a decision from an IJ who wants to do that. But also: “see attached
--- a Dirty Immigration Lawyer
At least, not a deep review of history.
Maybe instead of getting rid of them and administrative law judges, they should be moved to the judiciary to prevent interference by whatever executive is in power
But also
2) not the only
Immigration Judges denying qualified people of asylum, Trump has yet to return Garcia and others that was ordered by multiple courts and the supreme
Democracy no longer exists here