Don’t let the NYT's normalization of Trump's regressive, anti-woman policies fool you.
When Republicans talk about wanting more “parents” at home, they mean more women at home. They push policies that limit reproductive rights, undermine access to childcare, and devalue women's contributions...
1/
When Republicans talk about wanting more “parents” at home, they mean more women at home. They push policies that limit reproductive rights, undermine access to childcare, and devalue women's contributions...
1/
Comments
Stop deluding yourself that you're support of the shitstream media does anything other than fund their destruction of everything decent in the country. All they care about is money
PUSH BACK NOW
With that said, rhetoric like this article is a stark reminder of what we are dealing with. Not good!
"a woman's place is in the home".
every single neo-nazi i have ever known (unfortunately) has based their entire family structure around this claim.
(see: JD's comments about crazy cat ladies)
If you know what I mean.
Their images used are even in the same style!
We could do this:
https://bsky.app/profile/sflol.bsky.social/post/3lowhtqlopk2w
Basically communism, yes 😁
This pronatalist agenda isn’t about supporting families; it’s about pushing women out of the workforce, stripping them of financial independence, and relegating them to second-class citizenship.
In other words, it's about controlling women.
2/
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/12/us/politics/republicans-parents-babies-home.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Gk8.Wml8.QgQGNcIQ5Lbe&smid=url-share
https://www.studycountry.com/wiki/what-countries-pay-moms-to-stay-at-home
1. Poor, uneducated people
2. Poor women at home, growing kids (not raising. Growing)
3. Poor men working for scraps & paying high taxes
4. Kids joining the "workforce" as soon as possible
ALL to make Republicans and their masters, their rich donors,
RICHER.