It’s wild to me that Jerome Powell of the Fed is safe from Trumps interference because of the history of the Fed (created in 1913) but the Library of Congress isn’t even though it’s been around since 1800. All according to our corrupt Supreme Court.
is there an equivalent term for defendants as standing for plaintiffs? like, if they dubiously represent the entity/party getting sued, can they be sued? i may have been harmed by the administration, but if there's no authority/office/responsible party to sue... can i sue?
I've said it before-muskrats thought they'd grab all the material at LOC for AI-the way they grabbed OPM data, Treasury data-to be stopped by the fact that LOC's digitised material is effing TINY in volume. Internet Archive, Guttenberg, Michigan, Yale & every private archive is vulnerable. NOT LOC.
Your honor, I did not "blackbag" those people and "human traffic" them to a "black site." I was merely traveling, as expressly provided for in Article 4, Section 2...
The wildest part of the lawsuit caption page is that she's not even wrong though? Like we put in "purported," "putative," "supposed" etc in front of those titles when we ran our story, because like. Very legally dubious appointments!
Comments
We're living in an episode of Black Mirror as it is unfolding in the strangest ways.
Love it
US Copyright Office found AI companies sometimes breach copyright. Next day its boss was fired
Some see an action to benefit Elon. The White House sees an agency obsessed with DEI
Fucking wild indeed!
… in her capacity as the person claiming to be my mother.
Backstory here: https://www.theverge.com/politics/666179/maga-elon-musk-sacks-copyright-office-perlmutter