When I teach info literacy, we use the CUT method (developed by Meg Eastwood as a simpler CRAAP method):
C- Current? When was the information published?
U-Useful? Is the information relevant?
T- Trustworthy? Who is the author? Do they have a conflict of interest? Do they have relevant expertise?
C- Current? When was the information published?
U-Useful? Is the information relevant?
T- Trustworthy? Who is the author? Do they have a conflict of interest? Do they have relevant expertise?
Reposted from
Liz Neeley
Information hygiene request - please circulate & take action.
I’m getting bombarded with frantic fragments.
Information flow is crucial right now, and every link in the chain matters. This is a concrete place where you can play a massive role in improving transmission.
Start with SIFT method:
I’m getting bombarded with frantic fragments.
Information flow is crucial right now, and every link in the chain matters. This is a concrete place where you can play a massive role in improving transmission.
Start with SIFT method:
Comments
If it is a secondary source, I have students look up the primary sources referenced.
If there are no primary sources referenced... that is a 🚩