We proved this in WWII, it's the second option, and it's how the Allies won.
Reposted from
Sam (ABeardedPanda)
Who would win?
A military entirely consisted of intensively trained light infantry with CAS provided by whatever bullshit Palmer Luckey cooked up
Or
A battery of 155mm artillery guns corrected by some dude with a quadcopter that has a thermal imaging camera
A military entirely consisted of intensively trained light infantry with CAS provided by whatever bullshit Palmer Luckey cooked up
Or
A battery of 155mm artillery guns corrected by some dude with a quadcopter that has a thermal imaging camera
Comments
I don't think the point is that there are no other troops in the second scenario, it's just that them fighting the SOF is not how the win goes down. And that was doctrine in WWII.
Then Allied men got the sads because they weren't warriors and ruined everything.
Then absolutely; I tend to agree with Field Marshal Slim on SOF…😏
My original comment made no sense in this context.
I’ve had a long day, with too much time online and too much abuse; I’m sure I misread your original post.