My editorial on how journals can earn trust.
We often use journal names as proxies for quality. This is bad bc it’s not valid. But it could be. Editors could make journal name a valid signal. And we could place value on journals that show us how they do that.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09567976251336246
We often use journal names as proxies for quality. This is bad bc it’s not valid. But it could be. Editors could make journal name a valid signal. And we could place value on journals that show us how they do that.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09567976251336246
Comments
I don’t think that the profit motive needs to be terribly at odds with an occasional retraction. They have an infrastructure for processing a retraction.
To speed up matters, once they agreed but before they released the text, I went to social media with an announcement.