Cause of course the devs are money hungry right? What the fuck no they're their to do the job given, if the guy in the suit says: "mk gam 4 window bruv"
The developers will do that
Also. a few hours, more like a few days, months, years.
Not everyone is just using Godot
The developers will do that
Also. a few hours, more like a few days, months, years.
Not everyone is just using Godot
Reposted from
Phaylali
It's not on linux , it's on the money hungry game devs and studios not wanting to add a few hours to include linux , or just to make it proton compatible , almost all proton compatible games are running with no issues , check the proton db , there is more than 10 000 games supported
Comments
And also have you seen CS2, it's an absolute disaster in performance on Linux and VAC is *not* working at all
And also I am legit struggling to find a non source game that is native Linux
Two: the vac thing
It's like saying: "dude your brain is fully functional without it you'd be dead"
That still doesn't mean it's at all functional my lord
What is even your point here
BILLARD GL IS AN X11 GAME THAT ALSO WORKS ON WAYLAND WOWWWWW
(Also Wayland is a pain sorryyyy)
proton compat seems to be down to anticheat most times i think though, right? iirc rockstar pulled proton support for that reason
Game companies aren't there for all the giggles and fun shit they're there to make money
However much I love Linux
90ish % of users are on Windows, they're not losing big money because of no Linux support
THE ENTIRE THING I SAID IS HOW IT'D COST MONEY AND NOT MAKE ANY BACK
also remember VAC the most fully (non-)functional anti-cheat
Also how would they be easier on Linux, explain why