I've stated above that I agree with the anonymity of the members at hand. It's been said multiple times since the valid arguments of doxxing have come forth.
I do not agree with the current state of the code-of-conduct and the secrecy of SS' operations.
I've said in my initial post that it wasn't my intention to compare SCOTUS to SS, and agree it's apples to oranges.
I don't think my improper wording of my initial statement takes away from the fact that we need change brought to the way splat safety operates. The code must be adjusted.
Sure, but regardless the impact of your posts have been highly inflammatory and degrading. By all means post criticism I’m just saying next think a little more about what’s being said and implied in your posts before posting
Comments
Your first post in this line of tweets directly implies that splat safety can *NOT* have the community’s interest in heart while being anonymous.
Your previous posts have likened them to the Supreme Court.
You multiple times have very much so accused
Thats what im saying is extreme and you should stop.
I do not agree with the current state of the code-of-conduct and the secrecy of SS' operations.
I don't think my improper wording of my initial statement takes away from the fact that we need change brought to the way splat safety operates. The code must be adjusted.