Just a friendly reminder that Poilievre not having security clearance was and is a very real concern and not just a reason to dunk on him leading up to the election
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
That a hole needs to be shown a proper exit from leadership with another loss in the next election, which I really hope only happens in 4 years if this minority can somehow figure out a way to survive that long
I third this. Honestly, none of us should want a leader who cannot obtain their security clearance. I want to see this issue put to bed and never arise again.
It is strange to me that many Canadians voted for Poilievre and dismissed the fact he has no security clearance. Do they not think that the PM must have security clearance?
I don’t understand how people who voted for Poilievre could over look this fact. Shouldn’t a willingness and ability to protect Canada be job one of a PM? I sincerely hope one of them can explain it to me, as yet none have.
Sam, yes I am an asshole, but never without reason. With the dozen votes pigeon pete made against women alone, he deserves all the scrutiny I, and others, give him.
Comments
That a hole needs to be shown a proper exit from leadership with another loss in the next election, which I really hope only happens in 4 years if this minority can somehow figure out a way to survive that long
We have women in the family.
Just a friendly reminder that there's a reason he won't get it...
https://bsky.app/profile/thewarrenisempty.bsky.social/post/3loakujqhbk2l