Definitely trending in the right direction. But they’re still complicit in not reporting news like the UN’s intervention. I don’t see how any news outlet can justify that as not being of significant interest to the public.
I don't like how she refers to gender neutral toilets. The women's toilets are not gender neutral with trans women in them. Parts 26 and 27 deal with gender neutral in essence. Para 28 is different. I don't like GN loos. I'm not against them either. But I'd prefer choice & mine would be women's loo
I agree that's what I think she was talking about, but I don't like those either!! Like I said, I'd like everyone to pee where they want, I just prefer the "ladies". I wouldn't cry if they made them all like that, but honestly, I think I would be less inclined to use them.
I agree that usually they put disabled people as "others" rather than making the actual toilets fully accessible. I'm not physically disabled to the extent that I can use any toilet so I can't comment on what is best, I just assume that I'd prefer to have accessible ones regardless of type.
Yes, it just shows the hypocrisy of the so called women’s movement who claim unisex loos, even if lockable, aren’t good enough. Apparently disabled women aren’t women to them, in that case. (As a nonbinary person I’m happier in a third space anyway, so… *shrug*)
Comments
It's giving "Whoops!" when in a just world there'd be public denounciation rallies.
hint, law completely ignores the existence of XY and other problems.
I might be wrong about that. 🤷