Oh he will manage it, but I’ve never seen an organization so soft as to try to pass a rule to stop one team from running a play that legally whipped their ass twice with in one season.
Well they have yet to come up with a good reason to ban it, so it’s clearly bitterness since the league data shows it’s not an injury concern and the pace of play is not effected
Or the league never wants to see that stuff against the Commanders happen ever again.
If this passes and 23 other orgs vote with the Packers on this, you're gonna think it's just GB being bitter or a league-wide conspiracy against the Eagles?
Having forward progress but allowing the offensive players to push another player forward is nonsensical. Disallowing that makes sense. Otherwise you should get rid of forward progress and allow the defense to drag the ball carrier backwards.
Comments
One might consider they're leading a charge that other teams/organizations agree with rather than being bitter about losing 2 games.
If this passes and 23 other orgs vote with the Packers on this, you're gonna think it's just GB being bitter or a league-wide conspiracy against the Eagles?