David's trying to gloss over a bigotry parade as mere routine regulation of "treatments of dubious effectiveness."
So here's amicus briefs from The American Academy of Pediatrics, The American Psychological Association, biomedical ethics professors, and law professors explaining why that's false. 👇
So here's amicus briefs from The American Academy of Pediatrics, The American Psychological Association, biomedical ethics professors, and law professors explaining why that's false. 👇
Reposted from
David French
"Attempting to protect children against the lifelong consequences of medical treatments administered before they’re old enough to fully understand the risks isn’t malicious. It’s a traditional function of American government." www.nytimes.com/2024/12/08/o...
Comments
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323964/20240903155151548_23-477%20tsac%20Brief%20of%20Amici%20Curiae%20AAP%20et%20al..pdf
American Psychological Association:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323885/20240903123631640_23-477%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20American%20Psychological%20Association%20et%20al..pdf
Biomedical ethics professors:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323949/20240903153031965_23-477%20Amici%20Brief.pdf
Law professors (focusing on rights of parents):
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/23-477/323925/20240903143844260_23-477%20Amici%20Brief.pdf
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31838960/
Here is the pdf from the researcher's own website
http://www.jamescantor.org/uploads/6/2/9/3/62939641/cantor_fact-check_of_aap.pdf
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Cantor
It's adorable that you think a vague characterization and guilt by association somehow make facts disappear
the majority of minors who have mastectomies are cis boys with gynecomastia, most of which is idiopathic (i. e., a physical difference, not a health issue)
why are these are safe for cis kids, but not for trans kids?
(bigotry)