This ends 30 years of madness that gave Moscow a giant lever of influence over the whole of Europe
https://www.ft.com/content/e99efa2b-338a-4065-89c6-0683d5759ed7
https://www.ft.com/content/e99efa2b-338a-4065-89c6-0683d5759ed7
Comments
With the time it'd take to find a location to build etc more like 15+.
By then the power grid should already be mostly free of fossil fuels anyway.
Decision to build new power plants would have needed to be made 10 years ago for them to have any significant impact on decarbonising Germany's power.
I’m proud of my home state of Georgia for recently bringing a new nuclear reactor online.
Nuclear has the potential to bring almost unlimited carbon free power without the environmental & aesthetic destruction caused by massive solar and wind farms.
Until the change of government, Germany was well on its way to a future based solely on renewable energy. That's over now. Consider this: The USA is 27 times larger than Germany. YOU may have room to store the nuclear waste. WE, our children, our grandchildren, and all who come
⏬
after us, will have the nuclear waste lying around here for the next 250,000 years. And no one knows what to do with it.
I just feel sorry for my descendants, and there's nothing I can do about it.
I’m just saying let’s not jump from the frying pan into the fire. We have no idea how to secure nuclear plants or the waste they produce.
If Germany wanted nuclear weapons - that would be the only reason to have nuclear power plants.
For energy consumption they are too expensive AND - as Ukraine shows - they create safe heavens for invaders and potential for blackmail.
This is why they need a steady power source.
b) not nuclear power
c) there are still unused possibilities to save energy