You have to ask why was a team of four 18-19 yr olds looking that closely at ballots?
And why in the world would they need to make a program like that?
You can look up BallotProof on github, see all the files, and know why.
Here's the link to the test files: https://tinyurl.com/ballotprooftests
And why in the world would they need to make a program like that?
You can look up BallotProof on github, see all the files, and know why.
Here's the link to the test files: https://tinyurl.com/ballotprooftests
Comments
They said they would, and they are sociopaths and have no empathy. They're incapable of it. The whole part? Break al the things that you like. Tear it all down. Walz knew..
That's what he won.
They've made that clear with their clear avoidance of the topic 😡
Check out @jessicadenson07.bsky.social
She started there but left because of the lack of accountability
Can your team take a look at this?
Musk calls for a nationwide shift to paper ballots, piously implying that he’s anxious the voting should be fair.
But doesn’t this BallotProof program use paper ballots in its process of tabulation?
It's clear looking at the GitHub page it's designed to help verify a ballot is correct for submission to reduce rejection rates.
The generate_py script is for testing.
"We use these sample ballots as tests for model functionality"
But you can also use it to cut things, and people.
Just because one program is made to create test ballots doesn't mean you can't use it to generate cheat ballots.
It generates legit looking ballots, that's the important thing.
In essence, it’s simulating “filled-out” ballots.
"The generation script (https://generate.py) enables the generation of semi-randomized ballots that fit certain satisfiability criteria."
Here's the actual link:
https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof/blob/master/generate.py
Your patience is mighty, Anroth. This thread/OP could so easily become disinfo
“Data augmentation” as it’s called
It looks lke they had to test their program, so they created a secondary program https://generate.py that auto generates ballots based on a singular example.
Google turns it up on github here: https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof/blob/master/generate.py
When you write code you also include tests they prove it works, they needed sample ballots to prove it with.
Please talk to software Devs before embarrassing yourself again.
https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof
So what else do you use a function tool like this for, if you don't also have access to actual ballots?
Actual ballots with proofs/watermarks etc?
Here's that answer:
~ trump 2 days post election 2024
This is why Election Truth Alliance wants a hand count of PAPER ballots, especially in the battleground states.
We should never ever have gone away from having a direct way to link the actual paper ballots to the electronic count. There is no excuse not to.
Yes it adds a layer of complexity/variability, but if its a cross-check/QC measure it doesnt have to be 100% accurate
https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof/blob/master/generate.py
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Maricopa_County_presidential_ballot_audit
If only we had intelligent people who would look at the evidence but, nah
Here's the actual GitHub URL:
https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof/blob/master/generate.py
And every other news agency you can.
Put together everything in a package for them.
Because they need to report this worldwide.
#news
Elon Musk just got a $100m Starlink contract ahead of Ontario election by Doug Ford who links to MAGA
https://github.com/DevrathIyer/ballotproof
https://github.com/HonestBrothers/ballotproof-vision
There are test ballot files included because they are needed to verify the software functions.