universities unleashed violence against their students last spring. they are part of the problem. they complied with dehumanization and now they are complaining their surrender was not sufficient.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
for a long time universities have not been living up to the aspirations that motivated their existence. yes, students, profs, admins will be hurt immediately, but long term so will be anyone, including industries, who benefits from the innovation.
just as elections have consequences, so do choices. individual choices have compound effects. a society indulging in immediate satisfaction has to relearn long-term planning.
No. Just no. There were 2-4 universities that did that. The other 3000 did nothing. They thought the white towers would be protected if they laid low. They were wrong. You have no idea how intertwined higher ed and the feds are, for mostly good reasons.
Thank you for clarifying. I understand the point you are making. The silence in quite a few universities over this issue was distubing. And the violence against students and faculty in others was terrifying.
Columbia, Princeton, Northwestern, Harvard, University of Michigan University of Chicago, DePaul, Emerson, University of Texas, UC Irvine, UNC Chapel Hill...there are many more, many more than 2-4 institutions.
Comments