Despite never wanting to write about this again, I have written about whether or not we should take Trump's rhetoric around things like using military force against Greenland seriously, even if the ideas aren't presented seriously.
https://othermeans.io/p/everything-is-serious-even-if-nothing
https://othermeans.io/p/everything-is-serious-even-if-nothing
Comments
Trump is a disruptor, which may have some positives but basically means the USA can no longer be considered a strategic partner only a transactional one
Shame
Unless I'm misremembering and you did cover that.
Then finally summing up and comparing how each of them can be used to study various scenarios. And how to design new games/maps to test others.
I will not dignify his dementia with my attention.
*watching U.S. soldiers committing war crimes in Panama* “man this is gonna be a real boost for dems in the midterms”