https://www.adambienkov.co.uk/p/the-founding-myth-of-morgan-mcsweeney
Very good analysis of the overcooked past record of Labour's strategy 'genius' Morgan McSweeney and the dismal failures of Starmer in office.
Like Cummings, eventually McSweeney will get the chop, but whether Labour is smart enough to do it now is doubtful.
Very good analysis of the overcooked past record of Labour's strategy 'genius' Morgan McSweeney and the dismal failures of Starmer in office.
Like Cummings, eventually McSweeney will get the chop, but whether Labour is smart enough to do it now is doubtful.
Comments
Starmer's speech was disgusting and disgraceful. A Labour PM should never have used that language. Labour will never be able to out Reform, Reform and should be shredding their policies rather than pandering to racism.
Labour needs to wake up to the votes that they are losing
Starmer understands self preservation and he's pretty ruthless when he needs to be.
In which case the question is who is waiting in the wings?
We've seen no evidence that Starmer has his own principles and convictions that he's been suppressing and will then blossom into a beautiful policy butterfly.
But I think he might realise the current direction is misguided in a strategic sense and we might end up in a better place out of sheer calculation on his part.
One thing I feel sure of is that he's not going to step down. Unlike the Tories, to whom regicide comes naturally, Labour has little experience of deposing unpopular leaders in office.
He’s finished. And rightly so.
'When were you PM?' is a childish argument and you should know better.
Do you think a Labour government should fear unfair press and curtail its policies accordingly?
https://www.declassifieduk.org/morgan-mcsweeney-plot-without-precedent-in-labour-history/
Does Kier Starmer look to you like a man with no convictions or ideas of his own?
QED.
Republicans still have caught on.
They say it because they are morally empty and it suits them.