And how did the pro-Palestinian protestors attack on Dems work out for you? And BTW, you can criticize a policy you dislike by not misusing the word genocide.
99% of Cambodian Viets were killed by the Khmer Rouge. Approximately 66% of European Jews were killed by the Nazis. The reality of genocide is minimized by sloppy propaganda.
According to Al Jazerra Gaza’s population reduced 6 % in the war Hamas started. The genocide by the Islamic State against the Yazidi’s displaced 71%. The genocide against the Tutsi’s killed approximately 60-70% of the Tutsi’s living in Rwanda.
First of all, all war is awful; innocents tragically die. Innocent Gaza civilians died. And innocent Israeli civilians died. All those deaths are tragic. Members of Hamas were killed. Members of the Israeli IDF killed. That is war.
No. It is war. It is why it is evil to senselessly start war. When a country is attacked by terrorists; the country will attack back. And civilians will be tragically killed.
She was not. She was supporting the genocide and kept silencing Palestinian voices. All anyone was asking her was to actually take a stance *against* the genocide instead of saying she was going to continue funding it. Why couldn't she do that, and why are you defending genocide?
Comments
Which one is *closer to your goal*?