One can't win this by staying nice, there ears are deaf for reason. This could go as far as a civil war. - ThreadSky

satyavacas.bsky.social • 40 days ago

One can't win this by staying nice, there ears are deaf for reason.

This could go as far as a civil war.

Comments

mastercylinder123.bsky.social•36 days ago

Hell yes

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

Oh i see your Dutch, no wonder you consider name-calling fighting, its not like you'll be having to do anything else are you. I appreciate what you're trying to do. But could you try to do so without hurting the people actually on the frontline, under attack and fighting for their right to exist?

satyavacas.bsky.social•40 days ago

Did i state my comment in or at the wrong place then?

As I see it one cannot counter egoism with sweets or correct information/data. The only thing that can get someone behind is ego to think is with a bigger lie or more stupidity.

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

You’re not wrong that facts alone don’t always change minds, but replicating cruelty isn’t resistance, it’s surrendering to the same tactics we oppose. The people under threat need solidarity and support, not more harm.

satyavacas.bsky.social•40 days ago

Ive read along some posts and see your point. Thank you.

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

You're quite welcome. And I'm sorry if i came across combative, I'm not used to people changing their mind on here. People tend to double down instead. It does you credit that you can and did.

satyavacas.bsky.social•40 days ago

I did not experience combat, rather the opposite.

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

So you're just gonna be mean at them and throw your allies under the bus of misgendering? Im not saying don't fight them, but what your doing is pointless towards them and harmful towards transgender people. So unless you're just trying to hurt the transgender community, find another way, please.

corbyntravers.bsky.social•40 days ago

My preferred alternative, because it's scientific and applies to all of us, just not expressed equally:

https://eartharchives.org/articles/human-dna-found-in-a-neanderthal-woman/index.html

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

For instance yeah. I personally still feel that name-calling doesn't so much fight them as emulate them, but if it helps your mental health through catharsis or such, i can understand that. Long as it doesn't do collateral damage to our allies.

corbyntravers.bsky.social•40 days ago

I'm not name-calling. I clearly said it applies to me as well and that it's scientific fact.

Neanderthal brains indicate higher occurrences of ADHD, one symptom of which is pronounced emotional reactions.

Good thing you're not emulating them by questioning my mental health....

🙄

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

Claiming Neanderthals had ADHD based on shared DNA is like saying your grandpa liked jazz because of his RNA. The study only shows interbreeding, not that Neanderthals had modern conditions. You’re projecting 21st-century diagnoses onto an extinct species. Bad science, worse assumptions.

observitor.bsky.social•40 days ago

Also, maybe dial down the defensiveness. I was pointing out your flawed logic, not attacking you personally. Name-calling happens when there's intent to put someone down. If I used your ADHD in an attack, it’d be name-calling. Same with calling MTG a Neanderthal, it’s still name-calling.

corbyntravers.bsky.social•39 days ago

I'll let the scientists know you disagree.

"we observed that introgressed Neanderthal alleles influence ADHD susceptibility in current populations."

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924977X17306582

Meanwhile, you continue to insult me while claiming that you're not doing so.

Cya ltr.

Oh wait--no, I won't.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply