I'm sorry, but quoting CO2 emissions from wood burning, particularly the burning of waste wood, against a gas boiler is simply wrong. Wood burning is part of the carbon cycle, whereas natural gas burning adds cumulative carbon to the atmosphere.
I admire your passion, but I'm not buying it
I admire your passion, but I'm not buying it
Comments
Lots of other people do. Including doctors and scientists.
Also physics doesn't care either.
Read the article I posted earlier.
Especially the parts in my next reply.
1/2
https://thebulletin.org/premium/2022-05/does-wood-bioenergy-help-or-harm-the-climate/
My gas boiler has to go!
You'll be contributing more to climate change if you burn wood rather than burning gas.
The facts show it.
Start the loop today and any future burning is bad.
The loop argument is very flawed.
WHEN WE HAVE MUCH BETTER OPTIONS.
I don't disagree that industrial biofuel energy is flawed, my argument is about local wood burning, and its cumulative CO2 contribution.