You know he's not supporting the US's actions, he clearly says he wants people to come back to the table and reach a diplomatic solution. Misinformation and fear mongering is just lazy and irresponsible journalism. - ThreadSky

highlandufi.bsky.social • 4 days ago

You know he's not supporting the US's actions, he clearly says he wants people to come back to the table and reach a diplomatic solution.

Misinformation and fear mongering is just lazy and irresponsible journalism.

Comments

alancampbell62.bsky.social•3 days ago

Iran were at the table then Israel and America attacked them.

highlandufi.bsky.social•3 days ago

Nobody is agreeing with what the US / Israel has done, that in no way means we shouldn't be encouraging all parties to come to the table.

agirlcalledlina.bsky.social•4 days ago

You’re an idiot

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

You're way too old to have not grown out of name calling. Good luck in life.

agirlcalledlina.bsky.social•4 days ago

At least I am not shilling for a genocide supporter, hun

nogenius.bsky.social•4 days ago

Get over yourself, you fucking Kevin

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

😂

puddlesofcustard.bsky.social•4 days ago

He literally is, this is weird denialism.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

He literally isn't, saying he wants a diplomatic solution and ensures stability, which is the same message sent out by EU leaders (among others) is not supporting the US.

puddlesofcustard.bsky.social•4 days ago

"The US has taken action to alleviate a threat" sounds like pretty positive language for an unsupportive person...

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

The US did take action, did they not? You seem to think stating what happened is supporting something. Strange logic I'll give you that.

puddlesofcustard.bsky.social•4 days ago

The "alleviate a threat" part is the bit I take umbrage with. They bombed a sovereign nation without provocation.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

Because that's what the US said they were doing and what led to their action.

Stating what happened does not mean you support something it just doesn't, no matter how you twist it.

delboyn.bsky.social•4 days ago

He's clearly following the Zionist narrative that illegal acts of war are acceptable.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

Where did he say it was acceptable?

delboyn.bsky.social•4 days ago

By not condemning it and framing it around the Zionist narrative, he's giving tacit approval.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

So in your head every one of our allies leaders are zionist and just playing their narrative?

delboyn.bsky.social•4 days ago

Not in my head,in Fact.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

OK, ta.

arachnocommunism.bsky.social•4 days ago

trump said "NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE" too. be serious.

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

Someone else said something different at a different point so that must mean Starmer approves of what the US did last night? Even you must realise that's a weak argument.

arachnocommunism.bsky.social•4 days ago

i'm pointing out that a half-hearted claim to want peace attached to a defence of war does not override it

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

But he hasn't defended war, literally the point.

arachnocommunism.bsky.social•4 days ago

right

highlandufi.bsky.social•4 days ago

Do you not agree that the US has taken steps to alleviate the threat? Simply stating what's happened is not supporting it.

Iran's nuclear programme being a threat is the general consensus between all of our allies, has been for a long time.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply