Someone else said something different at a different point so that must mean Starmer approves of what the US did last night? Even you must realise that's a weak argument.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
You'll also see Starmer wanting discussion and reaching a diplomatic solution, taking a wild guess you just think that's him lying, or it's not important.
And the US is of course wrong, nobody is defending what's been done, simply pointing out that you're trying to twist words into something they're not. He hasn't endorsed anything, he's used the exact same language other world leaders have used, and remain united at the need for diplomatic solutions
like, if a politician said the october 7 operation made it more likely that palestinians held hostage by israel would be released, y'alls would shriek about that being an endorsement of the attacks
Comments
Iran's nuclear programme being a threat is the general consensus between all of our allies, has been for a long time.
starmer is endorsing the nonsense logic of the attack, which is endorsing the attack. guarantee you would understand this in the other direction!