If bombing during wartime was a significant factor of climate change, the Earth would have collapsed after World War 2.
We should focus on industrial waste, massive overconsumption, green technology, less oil use, and so on
We should focus on industrial waste, massive overconsumption, green technology, less oil use, and so on
Comments
https://bsky.app/profile/fancyvegaspro.bsky.social/post/3lr6c62xtqk2i
Makes me think your opinions about where Greta Thurberg should be protesting aren't on the level.
But that still isn't the topic at hand about the climate crisis
But we must still focus on other long term solutions. Green technology, consumer behavior, so on
The emissions from the first 120 days of the Israel-Gaza conflict exceeded annual emissions of 26 individual countries.
https://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/2024/hss/new-study-reveals-substantial-carbon-emissions-from-the-ongoing-israel-gaza-conflict.html
Very few people take environmentalism seriously when there are much bigger fires than their own.
1. The amount of bombs dropped in Gaza was already, one year ago, more than all those dropped on London, Dresden & Hamburg in WW2.
2. This: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/jan/09/emission-from-war-military-gaza-ukraine-climate-change
Greta is perfectly fine focusing on both.
https://me-t.org/journal/en/research-studies/The-Environmental-Impact-of-WWII
Palestine is free none of us are free. The same govts doing nothing to stop a genocide are the ones also doing nothing very much about climate breakdown.
The bombs of 80 years ago are not comparable to the size and destructive force of modern weapons.