Excuse me, but isn’t limiting environmental reviews potentially endangering the environment— which ultimately impacts wildlife & the people? This sounds like it needs Erin Brockovich. I don’t see the “positive” spin in this shameless description. Nothing positive about endangering communities.
The decision removes protections for workers, consumers, communities, and the environment from highway, bridge, pipeline, wind farm, and other infrastructure projects.
Protesting a gas pipeline across your water supply? Forget it.
Planned highway dividing your community? No stopping it.
It is a lot to take in. The Protests will continue, still have local boards to talk with, but yes will be easier to push things thru. This administration will fall hard on the protesters, at first question.
Yes, some red tape needed to be removed. But, I worry about all the poorly planned projects that will get built before anyone realizes all possible impacts.
I'm reminded of that pathetic decision to change the water source in Flint MI to save money.
Another corrupt decision from a corrupt SCOTUS that serves their Oligarch masters. IF we ever get out of this mess, on day 1 this corrupt court must be unpacked and every corrupt decision they've made must be reversed immediately.
Comments
Doing Trump propaganda on headline hoping he will not cut funding like CBS?
SHAME
Protesting a gas pipeline across your water supply? Forget it.
Planned highway dividing your community? No stopping it.
I'm reminded of that pathetic decision to change the water source in Flint MI to save money.
🙄