ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
If the zubi is true the merino transfer (which was never against) makes a load more sense
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
aphexowin.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Elaborate please
0
1
reply
[–]
tomlangford.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Yeah this makes no sense to me
0
1
reply
[–]
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
It means Merino was more squad that nailed on starter. And if a potentially world class guy smile coming a depth signing is more defensible
2
1
reply
[–]
janhopis.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
I think this was always true, he's just Rice rotation in the 8 and Zubimendi doesn't change that
0
1
reply
[–]
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
At some points I think Rice-Merino-Ode was the plan, glad it's not! (Even if I convinced myself that in fact this was an interesting plan)
1
reply
[–]
notoriousjfe.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Do you mean from a "signing his mate" perspective? Or perhaps we paid slightly higher than was necessary to smooth the relationship with Real Sociedad?
0
1
reply
[–]
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Neither actually - more that if the number 1 target is coming in a year then a squad player as stop gap makes sense
0
1
reply
[–]
notoriousjfe.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Yeah that makes sense. Squad building is weird isn't it, you never complete it.
1
1
reply
[–]
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Indeed, ongoing. Although if the Merino stuff is true, and MLS can play games in midfield, then that area of the pitch might be sorted for a while
0
1
reply
[–]
notoriousjfe.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
MLS belongs in midfield IMO, but you know what that means..... we're gonna need a left back!
1
1
reply
[–]
mulletrider.bsky.social
•
156 days ago
Haha quite. If we could trust Cala's fitness then MLS having both roles would be good. If bloody tony got fit we'd be completely fine
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments