As for how RL is not tractable. I’m honestly not sure what you’re saying? It is difficult and often expensive, but it’s still very useful and is an active field, and people make RL systems as hobbies. RL is behind any headline about AI playing video games, for example.Honestly baffling dismissal.3/3
Comments
You are interested in other things than what this paper is about. That is valid. You can ignore our paper.
But it doesn’t cover RL, and the ruler (mimicking humans) isn’t a good measure.
What’s your response?
It may help to read the paper in this contextualised way and follow along how we build the ideas, instead of pre-set expectations.
Your paper specifically opens by making claims that GI isn’t computation, but RL is computation, and this paper says nothing about RL.
Your paper does not open with the dry claim that AGI through replicating a distribution is intractable.
“Yet, as we formally prove herein, cre-ating systems with human(-like or -level) cognition is intrinsically computationally intractable”
Right in the abstract, plain as day, claiming that AGI is intractable with no qualifier towards it only being AGI through replication.
I have engaged in good faith, but bowing out now. You can read or ignore, but no need to waste my time