Here we go. “Yet, as we formally prove herein, cre-ating systems with human(-like or -level) cognition is intrinsically computationally intractable” Right in the abstract, plain as day, claiming that AGI is intractable with no qualifier towards it only being AGI through replication. - ThreadSky

About ThreadSky

garlend.bsky.social • 11 days ago

Here we go.

“Yet, as we formally prove herein, cre-ating systems with human(-like or -level) cognition is intrinsically computationally intractable”

Right in the abstract, plain as day, claiming that AGI is intractable with no qualifier towards it only being AGI through replication.

Comments

irisvanrooij.bsky.social•10 days ago

Read again, it says “human(-like or -level) cognition”.

I have engaged in good faith, but bowing out now. You can read or ignore, but no need to waste my time

garlend.bsky.social•10 days ago

Human level means that it can solve problems a human can. It does not mean that it will solve it the same way a human will. You’re effectively misrepresenting the strength and implications of your findings.

garlend.bsky.social•10 days ago

You have not been engaging in good faith. You’ve repeatedly ignored or deflected the points I bring up instead of engaging head on. You ignored the point I made about your claims about computation, and that’s just in the most recent message. You have failed to directly address any of my points.

garlend.bsky.social•10 days ago

You’ve completely ignored and dismissed the very important points I’ve made about the applicability of your results towards RL learning, you’ve ignored or misinterpreted my points about the sensationalism of your claims and abstract, and have generally worked to avoid engaging with my criticisms.

Posting Rules

Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply