To me this raises a similar issue as the “vote Uncommitted” people: your signal isn’t matched to its output. It’s impossible to know why someone doesn’t vote, so one makes the assumption one wants about such people. “They have a principled stance against X” is less likely than “they don’t care”.
Comments
the campaign to vote uncommitted was organized and known to be specifically about gaza as opposed to just people acting independently and willingness to perform that action, i think, signals willingness to be persuaded
there's also no designated champion to negotiate on their behalf
A fair amount of organizing politics is the old animal kingdom trick of making yourself look as big as possible.
total uncommitted voters is known to campaign, uncommitted gaza (y) is unknown but that a significant number especially in Michigan is known and reportedly worrisome by them
whatever the campaign estimates x are about gaza (z) i strongly suspect y/x>z/x