So apparently it’s no threat to anyone that Israel, Russia, North Korea have Nuclear Weapons but Iran developing a Nuclear weapon, despite no evidence, means they must be bombed. Does not make sense.
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
It kinda does make sense. One can only bomb them (without fear of possible rocks being thown back at you), if you know they don't have the bomb.
Once N Korea tested a nuke - they became untouchable.
Due to the idiocy of the US, the race is now on to become untouchable
Bat shit crazy but here we are
Nuclear weapons are the ultimate deterrence. If all else fails and they lose in battle, they can always take their enemy with them. It is bad that all these countries have nuclear weapons, existential really, but they already have them. No new countries must get nuclear weapons.
No. But not even paying lip-service to International Law does. They cannot land water and resource thieve under the current rules based order and piracy on land and sea is the name of the game. USA and Israel are rogue terrorist states.
I think it's about both trying to limit the number of nuclear nations, and worry about the particular perception of risk in the Middle East. UK, France Germany also are nuclear nations.
Can't be having the people with brown skin having nuclear...
It's clearly not about the middle eastern countries as Israel, the least stable and most aggressive state in the middle east is the only one with nuclear weapons.
Comments
That's the simple short version
Once N Korea tested a nuke - they became untouchable.
Due to the idiocy of the US, the race is now on to become untouchable
Bat shit crazy but here we are
And every other Western country has to immediately agree or be labeled Antisemite!
It's clearly not about the middle eastern countries as Israel, the least stable and most aggressive state in the middle east is the only one with nuclear weapons.