Incidentally, separate from the ethical aspects, I don't even know the legality part? Like it at least looks like they either generated AI straight up, or generated AI and traced. But, suppose they had the AI generate rough pencils. Is that OK?
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
It's a weird situation: I was speaking with one of the writers, and he did not understand: he saw the sketches, he saw the guy draw, so he couldn't imagine that was I.A.
Apparently the guy was in a rush and used his sketches as a prompt to generate the final illustrations. But for non-artists...
… It's counter-intuitive. They thought the software had just smoothen the lines, they had no idea the IA had redrawn everything.
We also have a bias as artists, we assume everyone knows softwares and understands how IA works.
… And also, the bias to think a style is obvious, easy to identify!
… I sometimes had people sending me random images asking if I was the artist, and sometimes it was almost insulting when it was really amateur stuff or stuff that had nothing to do with my style!
I think the REAL problems are coming fast, because here, there was a doubt. but I guess in a few years…
Like I think a lot of people are doing the "toupée fallacy" about AI generated art. That is, you think toupées always look fake because you never detect the ones done well. And doing AI art well is getting way easier on something like a quarterly cadence.
Comments
Apparently the guy was in a rush and used his sketches as a prompt to generate the final illustrations. But for non-artists...
We also have a bias as artists, we assume everyone knows softwares and understands how IA works.
… And also, the bias to think a style is obvious, easy to identify!
I think the REAL problems are coming fast, because here, there was a doubt. but I guess in a few years…