It is obvious that you do not understand biology. Killing a baby that is part of normal gestation is killing a new life that is NOT a threat to the mother. Being pro-life does not mean that you are against removing an ectopic pregnancy or actual life threatening process.
Actually, if she was concerned about the death rate, she has lots of options to avoid becoming pregnant. BTW, there's a 100% death rate from breathing.
An office job has physical risks related to being sedentary. Physical trainers suffer physical risks due to their job. Life has risks, and so does pregnancy. But those risks were invited by the mother when she spread her legs.
Your argument is logical and legal nonsense. A baby is not an assaulting evil person. A baby is a huge blessing. Pregnancy may have some risks (I am a doctor, I've done lots of OB anesthesia). But so does every part of life. There is no way to defend against every risk.
Comments
That's a risk of death from the baby.
Clearly she has the right to defend herself
Interestingly its a similar rate to the death rate from robbery.
And no one thinks you can't defend against robbery
An office job has physical risks related to being sedentary. Physical trainers suffer physical risks due to their job. Life has risks, and so does pregnancy. But those risks were invited by the mother when she spread her legs.
You can run towards danger with a gun and it's still legal defense.
Same with women