Vaccines DO NOT cause people to “become Autistic” - people don’t “become Autistic” or “grow out of Autism” - being Autistic is a lifelong neurological difference!
Comments
Log in with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
Everyone I know who has health issues was vaccinated as a child. Therefore vaccines cause the common cold, sleep issues, work-related accidents, and worst of all, several of them ended up pregnant later in life!
I tried so hard to tell peoplebthat 18-month-olds brains are developing quickly and they're interacting with their environment for the first time and it makes sense that they regress and retreat. It also makes sense that they could have autistic burnout because that can happen to autistic children
The thing I’m getting increasingly mad about is the endless attempts to try and prove that something, *anything* exists to connect vaccines and autism, and they all take as given that there’s a possible connection via the gut because a fraud and con artist used it as his angle.
Like, it’s been 40 years and billions of dollars sunk into this research and no one involved seems capable of recognizing that the mechanism they’re looking for is *insane* and that maybe 40 years of searching without finding anything at all is a good indicator that there’s absolutely nothing there.
But like, Wakefield was a *gut doctor* hired to manufacture evidence and his insane bullshit is very transparently a way to justify why a gut doctor was researching autism at all. But no one seems able to recognize that he was lying and that it was a fake hypothesis he didn’t believe was real.
Let's get the story straight. He was a gut doctor who was pushing his own formulation of the same vaccines delivered in a slightly different way and needed evidence to support giving the MMR vax in multiple doses and lied about it for a very good reason (profit).
But the fact that he just...made up the idea of a connection from whole cloth and had to go through multiple teams to find anyone who would be like "...*maybe* there's a thing here, possibly? We haven't found anything disproving it" is also correct.
Do a few studies disproving the existence of a connection, sure, but I've looked at a *lot* of the studies done and they're all tweaking Wakefield's original idea to sound less stupid and then, big surprise, none of them find anything.
Comments
But the fact that he just...made up the idea of a connection from whole cloth and had to go through multiple teams to find anyone who would be like "...*maybe* there's a thing here, possibly? We haven't found anything disproving it" is also correct.