I dare sam to read and understand this post. Note that the scientific question is no longer "do vaccines cause autism" but rather "by which mechanisms do vaccines cause autism". www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vac... - ThreadSky

energyscholar.bsky.social • 20 days ago

I dare sam to read and understand this post. Note that the scientific question is no longer "do vaccines cause autism" but rather "by which mechanisms do vaccines cause autism".

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/how-do-vaccines-cause-autism

Comments

sam3six.bsky.social•20 days ago

Try your .org, .edu and .gov sources. These publications are REVIEWED BY TEAMS OF PEERS. They are considered reliable as referenced in my last comment, by the medical science community.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2908388/

energyscholar.bsky.social•20 days ago

Right, Sam. We always trust the government because it would never lie to us. Isn't that right, Sam?

So Sam, do you support or oppose the recent policy change of testing vaccines for safety against an inert placebo? Why or why not?

laser2sail.bsky.social•20 days ago

I wasn't certain who I blocked, apparently not you so fine.

sam3six.bsky.social•20 days ago

Reputable Organizations Agree: Major health organizations like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention | CDC, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) all confirm there is NO scientific evidence to support a link between vaccines and autism.

energyscholar.bsky.social•20 days ago

Those USED TO BE reputable organizations. After living through their lies & corruption these last five years we now know better.

Sam, had you READ the article I posted, which you clearly did not, you'd see why your above statement was false. Here's one instance of this non-existent evidence:

sam3six.bsky.social•20 days ago

Those sources are still reputable to anyone in the scientific community, your source is still not considered a valid one. There are thousands of university publications which THOROUGHLY investigate the claims made on your https://propaganda.com website. I don’t waste time discussing conspiracy theories

energyscholar.bsky.social•20 days ago

And Sam chooses to remain within the socially engineered thought box. Sufficient money and PR can convince society of all sorts of things that are false. Per the opening paragraph

sam3six.bsky.social•20 days ago

That’s what all conspiracy theorists say. There are a lot of claims being PUSHED against vaccines. They’re not coming from Harvard or John Hopkins. Too many people die horribly without them, maybe find another hill?

energyscholar.bsky.social•20 days ago

Many die horribly as a result of vaccine injury. Seemingly at least ~20 million dead as a result of mRNA injections. The cure was worse than the disease.

How about we go by best available science & medicine?

The correct approach is to honestly evaluate PROS and CONS of each intervention.

Comments

Posting Rules

Reply