Obviously the funny part is that these are straight-up hallucinated books that do not exist IRL, but here’s what I keep coming back to: if you’re a publisher, and you’re publishing AI-generated junk… why should people read the AI-generated junk you publish instead of generating their own junk?
Reposted from
Rachael King
This was just posted by @tbretc.bsky.social on another platform. The Chicago Sun-Times obviously gets ChatGPT to write a ‘summer reads’ feature almost entirely made up of real authors but completely fake books. What are we coming to?
Comments
If you’re just pulling slop from the same BS chat bot that I have on my computer at home what exactly are you offering me?