Its not science if you don't write it down and don't let anyone see what you wrote. Also a hypothesis based on observed facts that can be tested is a requirement. Not just "i feel like red dye number 2 causes autism because the use of it correlates to the discovery of autism."
Reposted from
Dr. Jonathan N. Stea
Evasion of peer review is a hallmark of pseudoscience.
But even more insidious is the obviation of scientific scrutiny by publishing in pseudoscientific journals that exist to provide an illusion of scientific legitimacy.
There’s nothing new about MAHA’s propaganda tactics.
But even more insidious is the obviation of scientific scrutiny by publishing in pseudoscientific journals that exist to provide an illusion of scientific legitimacy.
There’s nothing new about MAHA’s propaganda tactics.
Comments