Sounds like you are trying to associate arguments to me that I didn't make. This is Canada's PM:
- The old US relationship is over
- What the US does next is a mystery
- What is clear is we control our destiny
Stay out of the US. Stop giving them money. https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3llf3jew7dk2j
You question "why she even chose to travel to the US." If this isn't arguing that she shouldn't have chosen (again, probably during previous administration) to be in the US, please explain your argument.
As a Canadian I'm well aware of our PM's words and the general attitude here about the US.
"I'm not going to argue that the regime wrongly revoked her visa"
If you're going to attempt to question-quote me, you should quote the whole sentence.
I quoted the relevant part of your "argument." Again, please explain how you are not arguing that she should have chosen differently and thus she is to blame for the consequences.
"At some point, everyone not from the US needs to question why they would travel to the US or stay in the US"
The second part of my sentence answers your confusion, which you perhaps didn't read after getting triggered to respond to a statement that's not an argument.
Comments
- The old US relationship is over
- What the US does next is a mystery
- What is clear is we control our destiny
Stay out of the US. Stop giving them money.
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3llf3jew7dk2j
You are write!
As a Canadian I'm well aware of our PM's words and the general attitude here about the US.
If you're going to attempt to question-quote me, you should quote the whole sentence.
I didn't present "arguments".
If you won't even listen to yourself why should anyone else pay you the slightest attention? Muting now.
The second part of my sentence answers your confusion, which you perhaps didn't read after getting triggered to respond to a statement that's not an argument.