ThreadSky
About ThreadSky
Log In
drugu.se
•
21 days ago
yea but webcrypto is like _the_ right tool for the job, and if firefox sucks at webcrypto, firefox should fix its webcrypto implementation
Comments
Log in
with your Bluesky account to leave a comment
[–]
tei.pet
•
21 days ago
nah, webcrypto suck anyway at the very least because they are async
webcrypto is literally slower than purejs/wasm sha256 implementations on small sizes purely due to async overhead lol
2
1
reply
[–]
drugu.se
•
21 days ago
well maybe then the solution is to add a sync version to the spec eh
1
1
reply
[–]
tei.pet
•
21 days ago
yeah but at that point a "proper" fix is gonna take like 3 years or something 🥴
3
1
reply
[–]
mary.my.id
•
21 days ago
even if they did do sync it'd be web workers only. i guess it'd still help in this case
2
1
reply
[–]
tei.pet
•
21 days ago
i mean yeah obviously
i really dislike how some web apis (including webcrypto) are async-only just so that they are non-blocking.
like bro we had a tool for that, it's called web workers.
0
reply
[–]
drugu.se
•
21 days ago
like anubis is a hack but anubis' implementation doesn't have to be a hack
0
reply
Posting Rules
Be respectful to others
No spam or self-promotion
Stay on topic
Follow Bluesky's terms of service
×
Reply
Post Reply
Comments
webcrypto is literally slower than purejs/wasm sha256 implementations on small sizes purely due to async overhead lol
i really dislike how some web apis (including webcrypto) are async-only just so that they are non-blocking.
like bro we had a tool for that, it's called web workers.