Court first heard that decades ago before the GRC happened.
The real news is the people telling the court to remove a minority's semblance of equality. And it's not even news, they've been doing this for years while being fellated by the Guardian.
Transgender people are a small minority group in the population and should receive moderate people’s support through common sense activism. Being used as props by MAGA is harming the cause.
Remove the definition of what a actual woman is,and replace it what the trans community believe a woman is.
Utter nonsense..It wont be allowed as the biological term which has been there since the beggining of time,tells u what and who Adam and Ever are.
This makes my heart so happy. Finally, the court is recognize the science in gender fluidity. Transwomen are women; transmen are men. These trumpites don't understand the (rape) risk that transwomen face if they're forced to use cis-male bathrooms.
Men have small gametes, women have large gametes.
Taking hormones or wishing it ain't so does not change this.
Love who you wish, live how you like, but denying science does not help.
Once again, your headline is highly misleading. A person with a GRC already has a right to be recognised by law in their gender. This case is about whether a GRC changes how a persons SEX is recognised in law (of course no one can change their actual sex).
There are male consciousnesses forcibly awakening within female bodies (& viceversa) producing transsexuality...and soon there will be animal consciousnesses forcibly awakening within bodies producing transspecies. If only we possessed the Spirit of Yhshoua to perceive such genetic-spiritual reality
This is skewed reporting and poor journalism. The case is brought by the Appellant, For Women Scotland, to challenge what they believe to be the erosion of women's rights and on the basis that sex is immutable. Why not report it objectively?
That's my point. It's skewed to look as though it's about the affirmation of trans rights. The case being heard is about women's rights being compromised and eroded, and the issue of biological women's safety. Why not say so?
Usual transphobic slant from the Guardian. FWS are challenging recognition that's been in place for over 20 yrs. But admitting that means you can't fearmonger about the supposed threat of trans ppl existing in society.
Never give the Guardian money or engagement. No better than the Daily Mail.
There is absolutely no comparison between the shit rag mail and the guardian
I will give you though that the guardian give a bit too much leeway to some of their columnists who talk crap sometimes
But it’s a free ish paper not owned by anyone
It has no agenda set in stone iyswim
They're both equally as transphobic, just the Guardian is less sensationalist about it. Which makes it more insidious. That odious shit rag has been seeding prejudice against ppl like me for a number of yrs now.
And if lies about us, what else is it lying about?
The mail lies about everything
I haven’t followed the guardian from a trans point of view so can’t speak of it
I wouldn’t have thought it was anti trans its pro so much lets say “woke”
This is why it's far worse than the mail. People see tghe Mail for what it is far more easily.
Just look at what they've posted. You'd never guess that what the case is actually about is trying to remove basic human rights we've had for over 20 years would you?
There is a direct equivalence: Both papers have regularly attacked and platformed attacks on trans people’s existence, human rights and legal protections.
It’s not okay when it’s the Mail. It’s also not okay when it’s the Guardian.
So happy to hear! Of course they have the right to be recognised in their gender, as do we all. It’s a matter of human rights and it doesn’t stand in the way for anyone else’s rights or freedom So let’s just let everyone live their life in as much freedom & dignity as possible 🏳️⚧️
Then how do you explain that science has observed many human societies all over the world and at all points in history that structure themselves around more than two genders? How do you explain that science has observed examples from the animal kingdom of non-binary social structures?
Comments
100% for that.
The real news is the people telling the court to remove a minority's semblance of equality. And it's not even news, they've been doing this for years while being fellated by the Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2004/jun/10/highereducation.uk1
Utter nonsense..It wont be allowed as the biological term which has been there since the beggining of time,tells u what and who Adam and Ever are.
Taking hormones or wishing it ain't so does not change this.
Love who you wish, live how you like, but denying science does not help.
#DamnLoretta
'tis the modern way.
Never give the Guardian money or engagement. No better than the Daily Mail.
I will give you though that the guardian give a bit too much leeway to some of their columnists who talk crap sometimes
But it’s a free ish paper not owned by anyone
It has no agenda set in stone iyswim
And if lies about us, what else is it lying about?
I haven’t followed the guardian from a trans point of view so can’t speak of it
I wouldn’t have thought it was anti trans its pro so much lets say “woke”
Just look at what they've posted. You'd never guess that what the case is actually about is trying to remove basic human rights we've had for over 20 years would you?
Back to you
It’s not okay when it’s the Mail. It’s also not okay when it’s the Guardian.
This is especially egregious, because The Guardian built up an image of left-wing fact-reporting journalism, ....
There are various developmental switches that can take a nonstandard turn. No one wants to be trans any more than anyone chooses skin colour.
https://theconversation.com/how-genes-and-evolution-shape-gender-and-transgender-identity-108911
Seriously:
CASE OF CHRISTINE GOODWIN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 2002
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-60596#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-60596%22]}
And enough says that the change is at least neutral.
Give them what they deserve... recognition.