the thesis of this lawsuit is that luigi was right and shooting the uhc ceo caused uhc to kill fewer people
Reposted from
Olúfẹ́mi O. Táíwò
"The group, which seeks...damages, argues that the public backlash prevented the company from pursuing "the aggressive, anti-consumer tactics that it would need to achieve" its earnings goals."
do you have a moment to discuss the Good News of dialectical materialism?
www.nbcnews.com/business/bus...
do you have a moment to discuss the Good News of dialectical materialism?
www.nbcnews.com/business/bus...
Comments
No egalitarianism? No rules.
I'm a pretty strict pacifist so "maybe violence is more effective than I thought" won't move me much but it's a good point
But I'm not unsympathetic to the argument that there's no real way for ordinary people to change some systems that don't benefit them within the law
The law not being respected does not end at a single statute.
(This is why the weird status of cannabis legalization is terrible for the country)
I was saying troll because their filing paints the claim denial negatively, quotes Warren & other critics of UHC. But maybe the lawyers do think they can make money.
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25933445-show-temp-4/
https://bsky.app/profile/somanymonkeys.bsky.social/post/3loqsmxdm2k2r
rabble rabble rabble
and also kind of broadly that you want the people inclined to start fights to tacitly understand that sometimes starting fights is, at a minimum, forgivable
I'm not quite sure that's the message shareholders should be sending in this political climate!