i think jumping on this particular bandwagon is in pretty poor taste. as my friend put it: "it’s just so transparently not true and not even interesting. but she does manage to sell it, she knows what kiwi journos want."
She's back! Amazing. Her little fictional life tale intersects with mine in that she's long claimed to be a founding member of the improv company I spent 20 years in (she was never part of it to my knowledge). One of our improvisors did so many Wikipedia edits correcting and recorrecting that record
She only gets any air time because NZ has such a limited pool of actual international celebrities. Also since when did NZ media ever check anything beyond the first google result?
She apparently "elected not to have a wi-k-ipedia page" (not a choice a public figure gets to make usually). Some strange hyphenation choices on her website…
Back in 2021 I got a long barely-coherent email from Wilding asking me to remove her "defamatory" Wikipedia article, saying she'd unmasked the identities of two of the cyberbullying editors, complaining about "deranged stalker" @davidfarrier.bsky.social, and soon. I declined to get involved.
Comments
- copy/pastable press release
-
Self fertilising poppies exist huh?
How very murrican of her🙄
I guess her dream come true would be if You made a flick About Her
Not if you're a (stereotypical) boomer in the 1990s, no. Get with the times, lady
She is clearly very self-important.