If journalism is exercised by human beings, journalists, there will always be a bias.
It's very difficult to get over the bias obtained through years of life experience. We just can't start behaving like robots with no emotions.
It's very difficult to get over the bias obtained through years of life experience. We just can't start behaving like robots with no emotions.
Comments
In reporting particularly, journalism sticks with a formula.
What you are really referring to is noise within communication (see Schramm’s model). Semantic noise cannot be avoided - it’s just you
Boundaries of journalism are loose and defined by biases and incomplete facts (which makes it difficult to draw strict lines)
Put the boundaries of the military industrial complex and you get the answer: YES
Put the boundaries of innocent people of Iraq, the answer is definitely: NO
Both are facts, just boundaries and perspectives are different
It provides an overview with details that allows readers to form their own conclusions. Was “Animal Farm” about a literal farm or a bigger society issue? The individual draws their answer from their knowledge construct… some people do miss the bigger picture.
Journalism states what is happening, not how you should feel or think. Again, that is media.
Opinions or perspectives are bias of the individual void of the facts or truths and fought within the individual.