The “moral equivalence”… Okay. Equivocate this for me: A terrorists breaks into my house, kills my wife and daughter, and takes my son as a hostage. I follow him and kill him in an effort to get my son beck. Which is justified?
Here you are criticizing the NYT for covering the murders, yet you also say neither killing is justified in this person’s hypothetical. You lack a moral compass. If neither is moral in the hypothetical, then neither is the genocide in Gaza or the murders and therefore the coverage is justified. Jeez
Comments