bjeromy.bsky.social - Profile | ThreadSky | a Reddit-style client for Bluesky

bjeromy.bsky.social

Asst. Professor at University of Nebraska College of Law. Northwestern Law alum. Admin Law, Election Law, & Separation of Powers research at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=3048278

188 posts 6,535 followers 597 following

Posts 11 Comments 39

There are many other reasons to oppose the bill (not to mention the alteration of senate process to pass it), but I have to transition back to research today. So I leave one final encouragement to please call your senators and urge them to vote against this bill. Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121

submitted 1 hour ago • 0 comments

Next up, for my discussion of the (ridiculously named) One Big Beautiful Bill Act: Restrictions on AI regulation. In the interest of full transparency, the following presents a significant amount of opinions and, of course, reasonable people can disagree. Capitol Switchboard: 202-224-3121 /1

submitted 2 hours ago • 1 comment

Next issue I want to highlight in the budget bill (I should note that none of these issues are new, and have been widely reported) is the vast increase in spending on immigration enforcement at a time when ICE appears to be unconstrained by law. Capitol switchboard number: 202-224-3121. /1

submitted 3 hours ago • 1 comment

Posting throughout the day today as a voter and an advocate, not an academic: I will be encouraging folks to call their senators to express their opposition to the budget bill, by highlighting various issues. Capitol switchboard number: 202-224-3121. First up: Medicaid cuts /1

submitted 4 hours ago • 1 comment

Remarkably strong correlation between pundits who told me the Supreme Court upholding Texas’s abortion bounty hunter law was technical and not a sign it would overturn Roe, and pundits assuring me birthright citizenship is fine because people can “just file a class action” or whatever

submitted 2 days ago • 30 comments

This is, in my opinion one of the key errors in originalism generally, but specifically in how it is applied to executive power. And it is no coincidence that originalists often lean into English history (which of course is monarchical) when deciding these cases.

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

We are heading down an incredibly dangerous road. Authoritarian government control over higher education is a step towards authoritarian government control over thought. UVA capitulating to this assault is incredibly disheartening and will not stop future demands from the Administration.

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

There is so much to say about Trump v. CASA, and many brilliant people are discussing them here and elsewhere. I want to add just a few thoughts on consequences for citizens, litigants, and government /1 🧵 www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p... www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24p...

submitted 3 days ago • 1 comment

The concerted act of “othering” people and voices that don’t fit into the State’s preferred mold is always an important step towards silencing these voices and removing g them from the polity. The Court’s decisions today advance the ball on this process in an alarming way.

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

If the Supreme Court thinks universal injunctions are unconstitutional, to wait until now to say that, in this of all cases, with this of all presidents, is a devastating indictment of both its impartiality and its prudence.

submitted 3 days ago • 433 comments

Among all of the other reasons to criticize Medina, it makes clear that Dobbs was never just about returning abortion decisions to the states. It was always (as @profmmurray.bsky.social and others have been saying all along) an intentional step making it harder to protect abortion rights everywhere.

submitted 4 days ago • 12 comments