Profile avatar
dangerwhale.bsky.social
Exciting new ways in which you're doing it wrong. Editor-in-Chief, Evidence-Based Toxicology. https://linktr.ee/paulwhaley
227 posts 95 followers 133 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter
Posts 13 Comments 37

The network evolves. We now have a rough draft of our first question set (design issues relation to the exposure regimen applied in a study) for our tool for assessing the internal validity of in vitro studies. Note, this is very rough! A Delphi will be done.

submitted 2 days ago • 0 comments

On the other hand, use of punctuation in scientific research is UP, with an ever-increasing flow of words colon more words article titles. I reckon we are smashing it on both a relative and absolute measure of frequency. We should be selling colon replacement keys for computers any time soon.

submitted 3 days ago • 0 comments

I've just tried 8 variants of Harvard citation style in my citation manager and every single one of them is effing wrong.

submitted 4 days ago • 0 comments

Data Colada has submitted a motion for sanction against Francesca Gino and her former lawyer team. I hope the court rules in their favor. It will be a powerful message that sleuths can expose fake research without fearing legal consequences. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

submitted 12 days ago • 1 comment

Scientific workshops are generally, how do I put this, painful - right? (Or maybe it's just me who lacks stamina for 15 back-to-back PowerPoint presentations in airless windowless rooms?) There is a better way. We wrote about it. Read it. End the suffering. link.springer.com/article/10.1...

submitted 12 days ago • 0 comments

huh what's that oh nothing just a concept network relating 375 bias concepts for in vitro research abstracted from the literature and focus group discussions that took 9 months and about 250 person-hours to build

submitted 12 days ago • 0 comments

So in one of my occasional stints as a peer-reviewer (editing means I don't do a whole lot of this anymore) I reviewed this paper for Frontiers in AI, recommended rejection because um well judge for yourself. www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/15....

submitted 14 days ago • 0 comments

This is a great model for publishing. It's not the model we have at EBT (we don't have the resources and we don't want to be selective, so we approach things a little differently) but if you are a selective journal, this has to be the way to go.

submitted 14 days ago • 1 comment

Short newsletter from my journal, really just showing our trajectory of thought on the issue of research fraud and forensic peer-review. With the most recent three papers that we have published. :) sh1.sendinblue.com/amir1fw0hxpf...

submitted 15 days ago • 0 comments

Never change, Copilot. :D

submitted 16 days ago • 1 comment

Uh oh. I don't even have this many followers?

submitted 18 days ago • 0 comments

This is a very nice rebuttal of a range of misconceptions about the use of structured bias appraisal tools in systematic reviews. Focused on ROBINS-E but the same arguments have been made against other tools. Won't convince naysayers but hey-ho. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

submitted 19 days ago • 0 comments

Still not convinced that scientists are the people best-equipped to talk about science. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2025/04/17/g...

submitted 20 days ago • 0 comments