Profile avatar
jfloyd314.bsky.social
MA student, early modern religious history at QMUL. Huge BYU fan living in London. BYU grad (political science '21). Latter-day Saint. Utah Jazz, RSL, Utah HC. I love politics (centrist), history, sports, aviation.
5,436 posts 2,199 followers 523 following
Prolific Poster
Conversation Starter

Progressives are going to have to reckon, at some point, with the fact that America--even most of America's left wing--is decidedly not progressive and is unlikely to become so. You're never going to build a governing majority through democratic socialism.

I love the UK. I love the people here. I think that at some point along the line, they took "Safety rules are written in blood" and turned it into a religion. They mean well, but they take things too far. And layers of bureaucratic meddling make the whole system gummed up and over-regulated.

His body will lie in state at the Memphis airport for three days, then be delivered to its final resting place via Columbia, MO; Trenton, NJ; Springfield, MA; Charleston, SC; Bakersfield, CA; Trenton again for some reason; and will then register as "out for delivery" indefinitely.

I love London, but I hate it for this.

Chat is it good when the armed forces completely stop trusting the civilian chain of command

Yeah, I think the key here is that regardless of whether it's possible to completely recreate the positive community-building and meaningful institutional affiliation of religion, nobody has really tried, and few seem to realize how detrimental that absence is.

Yeah, the damage is pretty well done at this point. MAGA itself as a coherent movement will collapse after Trump, but that won't change the fact that the ideological standard for the GOP is now "1950s Dixiecrat", and anyone left of that standard risks excommunication.

The irony is that Trump could probably get the votes in Congress for a resolution. He's choosing not to because he does not believe that he is constrained by the law (and, in a practical sense, he basically isn't in most areas).

And so far, this seems to be happening. We've seen very little, if any, pushback from the legacy media calling this illegal or criticizing it at all.

How am I just now seeing this for the first time lol

A Dem lawmaker and her husband were killed by a guy for their political views and it’s already out of the news.

I was briefed on the intelligence last week. Iran posed no imminent threat of attack to the United States. Iran was not close to building a deliverable nuclear weapon. The negotiations Israel scuttled with their strikes held the potential for success.

Yeah, don't underestimate the extent to which congressional Democrats writ large have contributed to the current environment where they have effectively no oversight of military actions. This is a both-sides problem; Republicans are obviously worse, but a lot of Democrats won't be much help.

And, like, no, it would not be good if Iran got nukes. It would be unequivocally bad. But this is not the way to handle the situation. Nothing about this is legal or even a good IR strategy.

Among many other things this is a proliferation nightmare. The lesson learned will be never negotiate with the United States.

They have made the world living hell for no reason whatsoever. People will ask why this happened in a decade and there will be tremendous effort to make it more complicated than “they were evil, stupid, and bored”

Kristi Noem trying desperately to get the rest of the NSC to refer to her as the "Proud Girl" like some Lost Boys ripoff

And that so far, Patel really doesn't seem to have succeeded in making the FBI a gestapo. Sure, he's going to try, but there's a lot of institutional weight there against outright gestapo-ness, and he can't fire everyone, at least not in the time frame he's working with. ICE was...already there.

IMO the really scary thing here isn't even the politicization of the bureau--it's bad enough, but I don't think it will seriously help this sinking ship of an administration to consolidate power. The scarier thing is the dismantling of public corruption investigations.

I missed the detail that the professor who gave the award is, in fact, a federal judge. Good mercy.

What precisely are the "things that make men who they are" that these hypothetical Democrats don't like?

You can also fail the paper because it argues that the 14th amendment is unconstitutional, which is...not how that works.

That one quote from a bank executive celebrating being able to use slurs at work again lives rent free in my head. So many elites are willing to burn the world in order to avoid being held accountable for doing stuff that won't make them happy anyway.

The fascinating draft case of Egor Demin ... here's @jakelfischer.bsky.social with a long look at the Real Madrid guard-turned-BYU star looking to crash the lottery in next week's NBA Draft: tinyurl.com/mu27nxac

Mildly hot take: I really don't even think Democrats need to affirmatively *do* all that much because of this. They need to just make sure that they're taking the side of the issue that isn't 15 points underwater, and avoid bailing Trump out by tacking rightward on immigration.

If you want to sum up the ineptitude of the Dems, it’s captured in how they exhibit zero curiosity about the forces that produced some of the largest street protests in history, only the (they assume) totally separate set of forces that affect the 2% of ultra-marginal voters they think are swingable

It's becoming clear that a lot of senior Democrats are not concerned about character, even with regard to grievous offenders like Cuomo. And that is not good, because the only way forward that this nation has is for the Democratic Party to become the inflexible guardian of America's values.

Part of this is a reflection of the media environment that we live in, which is almost entirely focused on criticizing Democrats, holding them to impossible standards, and presenting them as the other side of the same coin as Republicans.

My major takeaway from this is that a lot of big coal companies are just plain evil. So of course Trump is deregulating them.

All else aside, what exactly does Levin think the word "prerogative" means?