micbbbrad.bsky.social
Awaiting Brian Blessed's enlightened, communist rule.
Pretty good guitarist.
2,503 posts
572 followers
160 following
Active Commenter
comment in response to
post
Got to say, Greta really shoved my words that she'll ultimately quit and go back to being an average rich kid after she first appeared right down my digestive tract. She's a real one.
comment in response to
post
How dare Greata Thunberg *checks notes* attempt to bring food to starving people? God, I hope she dies hideously for this atrocity because I'm not a complete freak.
comment in response to
post
He and Walz are proof that the Yankee 'progressives' cannot be permitted to self-govern and must be ruled by their betters from civilised countries.
comment in response to
post
I got blocked by a Yank for disputing his claim that murdering Vietnamese people mafe his 'badass'. He replied 3 times immediately before blocking me. In conclusion, my respect for the troops is unparallelled.
comment in response to
post
You stand between one of them and a crayon and say that.
comment in response to
post
No I don't, dumbass. I'd happily see him executed with every other US President.
I can be anti-murderous invasions and anti-thieving, bigoted rapist.
comment in response to
post
Being progressive wasn't his speed, it was an act to gain political support.
comment in response to
post
You're being called a Nazi because you keep saying how you want to leave people to be killed by fascists and what enjoy doing so. It's almost incomprehensible how much of a braindead moron you are.
comment in response to
post
It's relatively useful for various (possibly most) apolitical things, but its editorship is dominated by American liberals, making it largely useless for anything political.
comment in response to
post
"The UK's no.1 satirical news site"
I scrolled back a week and they reached a record of 8 likes on a single post.
comment in response to
post
Normal encyclopedias are not written by random people from the internet. They are written by experts whose bias can actually be located since their names are provided and are then fact-checked by other people who, yet again, are not randos.
Also, many do do this.
comment in response to
post
A "stunt" displaying that Israel will not permit even the smallest amount of aid to reach those they are trying to murder.
comment in response to
post
Often they do not, other times the source does not make the claim, other times they can miss out context, the sources can be wildly inaccurate themselves, they may be heavily selective regarding the issue. At the start of this thread I mention that the source no longer existed.
comment in response to
post
"Did you see the one where our helicopters blew up our citizens? Bet you don't want to deliver aid now!"
comment in response to
post
I still wouldn't trust a source that can be edited by anyone to say anything.
comment in response to
post
I saw one article claim a 99.18% election win indicated confidence in the victor. Obviousness aside, the article about elections including that one noted that they were widely disbelieved.
comment in response to
post
Ah, I think I misinterpreted you there. Moreso, Washington and its consensus which includes Westminster, in this age.
comment in response to
post
I like how the source for her being tied to Dugin on wikipedia is a now-deleted opinion piece. Hmm, I wonder what happened to that.
Equally they try to tie her to LaRouche and the quote is like "I also think the IMF is sinister". Man akin to Hitler because they both agree sky is blue.
comment in response to
post
I don't know why I would respect a commitment to invading a foreign nation unprovoked or a service that murders millions.
comment in response to
post
My issue is the comparison. Protesting Trump is fair enough, all well and good. But when compared to participation in a horrendous invasion, it looks to me like the latter is being spun as an equally positive achievement to the former.
comment in response to
post
Ah yes, I (who did not participate in a murderous invasion) am the asshole,not the guy who did or the guy who's treating it as a positive.
comment in response to
post
Not travel to the other side of the world to kill innocent villagers. I'd argue that makes me the person here who is actually not a piece of shit.
comment in response to
post
I don't think participating in a murderous invasion is a service, unless the one being served is a complete freak.
comment in response to
post
Except this time he doesn't have the napalm and he's not fighting villagers.
comment in response to
post
Mate, you invaded a country using your vastly superior military hardware (notably an entire airforce) and got your arse kicked. You are not a bad ass.
comment in response to
post
Wtf were you doing in Vietnam? I ask because using it as a brag like this is pretty disgusting.
By all means protest Trump, but being like "I'll protest Trump like I massacred villagers" sucks, honestly.
comment in response to
post
The global south isn't the parasite, it's the host. The Western powers are the parasite.
comment in response to
post
This is true, but it is important to remember that we also benefit from this system. When the British proletariat takes power, they must remember they are indebted to the global south.
comment in response to
post
For bankers all over Britain. And using the wealth gained to pacify the British proletariat was part of that.
comment in response to
post
LMAO. No Scotland received great wealth for the exploitation of the Caribbean, Ireland, Africa, India and wider Asia. It was very much a participant in the Empire.
comment in response to
post
If you think there won't be plenty of greedy bastards in the devolved Parliaments, you'd be wrong. As long as they remain capitalist countries, the corrupt are always going to rise to the top.
comment in response to
post
It is the people. The reason British people have higher quality of life than so many other countries is because of the Empire looting those other countries. Our welfare state was built with stolen money. The benefits of the British proletariat were bought through the exploitation of the Global South
comment in response to
post
Please use your psychic powers to force choke him for being a nasty twat.
comment in response to
post
Interestingly, that also happens to be something the Western powers have done repeatedly in the past.
comment in response to
post
By the same logic the British imperialists don't represent English people. While not absurd, this does ignore the fact that English and Scottish citizens both received the benefits of imperialism.
comment in response to
post
There's deporting people (red) 😡 and there's deporting people (blue) 😁
comment in response to
post
I'm sure the Scottish slave owners (who represented more of Scotland's population than English slave owners did the English) were very enthusiastic.
comment in response to
post
Scotland had more slave owners proportionately than England. You can be for Scotland leaving Britain and oppose British imperialism without obfuscating Scottish participation.
www.blackhistorymonth.org.uk/article/sect...
comment in response to
post
While I have no issue with Scotland Independence, let's not pretend Scotland was a victim rather than an enthusiastic participant in the British Empire.
comment in response to
post
We need a Jeremir Lenyn to take over and purge the party of the right.
comment in response to
post
Mission Guaranteed but the protagonists are the ones trying to stop the mission instead of pulling it off.
comment in response to
post
Bary Garlow? More like Fake Fan! (The Fs have been switched in a cutting, witty reference to your name.)
comment in response to
post
Body language expert reveald Charles doesn't like it when people try to pull off his massive ears.
comment in response to
post
Harris described her commitment to Israel as unwavering and said that she would have done as Biden did. What Biden did was support them unconditionally. www.middleeastmonitor.com/20250429-bid...
comment in response to
post
There was absolutely no mass uprising by Germans at any point. Millions of Germans died fighting for Nazism and only 800,000 were deemed guilty of resisting it.
Most were not horrified. They went along with it and then permitted an end to deNazification as early as 1948.
comment in response to
post
She literally stated she would do what Biden had done. She advertised her own campaign as being one of making sure the US military stays very lethal.
Harris' racism towards Palestinians certainly contributed to her defeat.
comment in response to
post
Pretty sure the left were the ones doing the warning when they pointed out Harris' atrocious policies and unpopularity. Not to mention all of the failures of Biden that contributed to the defeat of the Democrats.
comment in response to
post
I'm afraid the Germans did not try to defeat the Nazis. The large majority were either Nazis or actively aiding Nazis.
comment in response to
post
"liberation of my country" This is completely false, the majority of Germans wanted Hitler to win. Friedrich is either very stupid or very dishonest.