Profile avatar
pdorman.bsky.social
I'm a political economist and writer on economics, politics, climate change, statistics, and lots more. I've written four books, stacks of articles and reports, blogs and am working on book #5. Watch out for really bad puns.
263 posts 111 followers 264 following
Regular Contributor
Active Commenter

Mostly agree, but Trump isn't so purposive. He craves domination and the humiliation of others, and his invocation of force reflects this. Whether it will prove to help or hurt him remains to be seen. (And it's partly up to us.) www.nytimes.com/2025/06/11/o...

Deport Elon? Sounds like a good idea, but where? I vote for Mars.

Has anyone kept track of the percentage of court orders that Trump has obeyed rather than ignored? (Including obeying vs ignoring pending appeal.) A spreadsheet would be nice.

Here's the comment I posted at the Times in thread-form. *Of course*, this was the result of using an AI agent to write some or all of the report. The limitations of AI for this purpose are well known, especially in legal briefs. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/29/w...

The media, including the NY Times, screams antisemitism, but there's no evidence the DC shooter was antisemitic. The article doesn't point out, however, that it's the Israeli govt's claim to represent all Jews that promotes conflation of anti-Zionism with antisemitism. fair.org/home/nyt-ass...

Just had an AI-generated "review" of a paper I coauthored sent to my inbox by Academia-dot-edu. Has this happened to anyone else? What's going on here? Was the paper selected at random? FWIW, the review was very positive; maybe it was tailored to me.

Spring in the PNW: salad from our garden, chicken in morel cream sauce à la Jacques Pépin, finished off by strawberry shortcake. Hoods are in, and they taste like they're macerated right out the box.

Just up: #4 in the series on the building blocks of economics, from a somewhat unconventional perspective. This one offers a metaphor for thinking about what markets do and don't. open.substack.com/pub/peterdor...

This replicates for the US the results found by Stutzer and Frey in "Commuting and life satisfaction in Germany" (2007).

It's one thing to be a sociopath, another to bring it to this level. Trump has a world audience, knows he's lying, knows Ramaphosa knows he's lying, and doesn't care. I guess if you're shameless in a small context, it's not that big a leap to this. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/21/u...

Not a conspiracist, but just wondering.....

This misses a crucial point: urban form and transportation systems interact, a classic multiple equilibrium problem. More Europeans live/work/shop near rail stations. How do we switch this? www.nytimes.com/2025/05/18/o...

Portland, my adopted home, is the City of Roses. Every spring it gets new roses. (Sorry.)

A new Substack, inspired by last month's piece in Semafor on "The group chats that changed America". open.substack.com/pub/peterdor...

This debate was annoying in the way it skipped over so many crucial issues. The comments section was closed by the time I got around to responding, so I'm putting it into this thread. www.nytimes.com/2025/05/16/o...

Search for "AI" and "tulip mania" on Google search, and you'll get about 277,000 hits. Scrolling through a few pages, most of them compare the current AI bubble to this: www.history.com/articles/tul...

Musk isn't very bright. A smarter owner of an AI program can tweak it to bias responses toward pre-set claims or positions. Such a bias could be invisible to most users. In fact, maybe this is already happening. www.theguardian.com/technology/2...

This stuff is so weird to me to read. Isn't it obvious that the core issue is the political economy of the problem? And this can be analyzed with theory and evidence! I tried to do that in my book, but instead we get simplistic assumptions. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/15/b...

There seems to an idea (conspiracy?) going around that some masked ICE cops are actually paramilitaries, like the Proud Boys. This seems like it could be researchable, since it would be enough to identify just one, if true. Plausible or not?

Wittgenstein and AI: Isn't the core problem, and source of hallucination, that LLMs can't identify human purpose in the use of language -- and this was precisely the basis for LW's language games. Proximity of words to each other doesn't provide a *purposive* context.